After Ksr - Stronger Patents Or Just Harder To Get?
Posted on April 20, 2008 - Filed Under Legal and Law | Leave a Comment
A recent United States Supreme Court ruling is causing quite a stir in intellectual property circles. The case is KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., et al., 127 S. Ct. 1727 (2007).
Background
To obtain a patent, the invention must be useful, novel and non-obvious. See Patents. The first of these, utility, is present for nearly every invention. The second, novelty, generally requires that the invention claimed is not disclosed in full in a single reference (patents, published applications or any published document anywhere in the World), and the third, non-obviousness, generally requires that the invention as claimed is not fully disclosed in a combination of references. Previously, to reject a patent for obviousness though a combination of references required some suggestion or motivation in the references themselves (excluding the subject patent application) that would lead one skilled in the pertinent art to make the combination of their teachings.
Read More..>>