Intellectual Property – Community Trade Marks – Likelihood Of Confusion
Posted on December 25, 2007 - Filed Under Legal and Law
In GfK AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (2005), a company’s application for a community trade mark was rejected on the grounds that there was a likelihood of confusion with a previously registered German trade mark.
On 15 November 1999, the applicant applied for a Community Trade Mark (CTM) for the mark “Online Bus” in Class 35 in respect of drawing up statistics in the fields of economics, marketing, market research and market analysis, business consultancy, organisation consultancy, professional business consultancy, news agency services in the field of economics. The CTM application was accepted and proceeded to publication.
On 6 October 2000, BUS – Betreuungs and Unternehmensberatungs GmbH commenced opposition proceedings against the CTM application on the grounds that there was a likelihood of confusion with its German trade mark, which was also registered in Class 35 in respect of a business consultancy.
The OHIM Opposition Division on 25 February 2003, refused the CTM application and the applicant appealed. OHIM rejected the appeal on the grounds that there was a high degree of similarity aurally between the two marks which would result in a likelihood of confusion for the German public.
The applicant further appealed this decision on the basis that:-
the registered mark had not been used in the form it was registered and so was in breach of Article 43(2) of Regulation No 40/94. The mark consisted only of the word “Bus” and did not contain the words Betreuungsverbund fur Unternehmer und Selbstandige. The design and colour of the mark were also different from that registered;
the word “Bus” did not dominate the opposition’s mark as it did for the applicant’s mark.
The court held that:
the differences between the registered mark and the applicant’s mark were not such as to alter the distinctive character of the mark in its registered form and;
even though there was a visual difference between the opposition and applicant’s marks, the high degree of similarity between the services and aural qualities of the two marks would still result in a likelihood of confusion on the part of the German public.
If you require further information contact us at enquiries@rtcoopers.com
Visit http://www.rtcoopersiplaw.com or http://www.rtcoopers.com/practice_intellectualproperty.php
© RT COOPERS, 2005. This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight general issues. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to particular circumstances.
Full service commercial law firm based in the City of London specialising in intangible property, intellectual properties, intellectual property, intellectual property law, intellectual property escrow,
intellectual property laws, intellectual property attorney, intellectual property definition, intellectual property issues.
intellectual property agreement, managing intellectual property, intellectual property attorneys,
world intellectual property, intellectual property litigation, intellectual property contract, trademark, copyrights,
infringement, copyright, copyright law, copyright protection, copyright laws, trademark search, copyright notice,
copyright infringement, trademark symbol, trademark law, trademark attorneys, trademark lawyers, legal patent,
patents law, patent laws, patent lawyers, trademark laws, legal trademark, patent law,
european patent law, patent infringement law, biotechnology patent law, uk patent law, trademark infringement law
Contact us at http://www.rtcoopersiplaw.com or visit http://www.rtcoopers.com/practice_intellectualproperty.php
Tags: intangible property, inte, intellectual properties, intellectual property, intellectual property law
Related Posts
- Intellectual Property Law - Trade Mark Infringement - What Is The Overall Impression?
- Intellectual Property: Community Trade Marks – Registration Refusal – Likelihood Of Confusion
- Intellectual Property – Trade Mark Infringement – Licensing – Passing Off
- Intellectual Property – Trade Mark Infringement – Figurative Community Trademark
- Intellectual Property – Trade Mark Infringement – Advertisement
Comments
Leave a Reply